From a book I read while waiting at the airport (when I wasn’t doing a comparative anthropology study):
THE FUNNIEST THING that ever happened in the printing shop of Jacques Vincent, according to a worker who witnessed it, was a riotous massacre of cats. The worker, Nicolas Contat, told the story in an account of his apprenticeship in the shop, rue Saint- Séverin, Paris, during the late 1730s. Life as an apprentice was hard, he explained. There were two of them: Jerome, the somewhat fictionalized version of Contat himself, and Léveillé. They slept in a filthy, freezing room, rose before dawn, ran errands all day while dodging insults from the journeymen and abuse from the master, and received nothing but slops to eat. They found the food especially galling. Instead of dining at the master's table, they had to eat scraps from his plate in the kitchen. Worse still, the cook secretly sold the leftovers and gave the boys cat food: old, rotten bits of meat that they could not stomach and so passed on to the cats, who refused it.Read on (I assume just from the name itself you can guess what happened next). From this book.
This last injustice brought Contat to the theme of cats. They occupied a special place in his narrative and in the household of the rue Saint-Séverin. The master's wife adored them, especially la grise (the gray), her favorite. A passion for cats seemed to have swept through the printing trade, at least at the level of the masters, or bourgeois as the workers called them. One bourgeois kept teenier cats. He had their portraits painted and fed them on roast fowl. Meanwhile, the apprentices were trying to cope with a profusion of alley cats who also thrived in the printing district and made the boys' lives miserable. The cats howled all night on the roof over the apprentices' dingy bedroom, making it impossible to get a full night's sleep. As Jerome and Léveillé had to stagger out of bed at four or five in the morning to open the gate for the earliest arrivals among the journeymen, they began the day in a state of exhaustion while the bourgeois slept late. The master did not even work with the men, just as he did not eat with them. He let the foreman run the shop and rarely appeared in it, except to vent his violent temper, usually at the expense of the apprentices.
By the way, I know it comes as no surprise to anyone that the French have always been amongst the top five weirdest nations in the world (read on to see what I mean).
43 comments:
'French' is not a nation. It is a people. You should have said, 'French have always been the weirdest people' or 'france has always been the weirdest nation.
Then I wouldve agreed.
I like it when people with negative five years of secular education (which being an American is enough, but being a frum Jew makes it much worse) give me advice or critique on matters of chochmas chitzoinius.
“Nation” and “people” are the same thing. France is not a nation; it’s a country.
Now, one thing I will give you: I should have said “the French”. OK, so the articles are the only thing I will accept critique on from frum Americans (assuming they are native English speakers, probability of which is often inversely proportional to the probability of being frum).
(corrected the article — thanks...)
You made the mistake, not me.
Admit when you are wrong.
Whatever.
I appreciate the desire to say the last word, but that word must make some minimal sense.
Correct and resubmit.
You are correct. France is a nation. French is a people.
I was correcting your use of the English llanguage, of which I value myself more than minimially knoweledgable in. I may not know much about 'chochmas Hagoyim', nor do I know how much you actually know.
Negative 5 years? Even as a frum girl we have the advantage over frum boys to have a secular education since grade school. So you are wrong in that.
I am Frum. I am American. I am a native English speaker.
And who are you?
'France is a country'
Sorry, my mistake.
France is not a nation. It’s a country.
Negative 5 years? Even as a frum girl we have the advantage over frum boys to have a secular education since grade school. So you are wrong in that.
That’s not saying much.
I am Frum. I am American. I am a native English speaker.
I am none of the above, although I am on my way to becoming two of the above.
Too true.
I will take a guess: an American, and a native English speaker.
Therefore, do not argue with me about the Englissh language. I am on better footing than you are.
I can sense your disrespect for me. That is rude.
That was my point: because I am not a native English speaker, I am on a much better footing than you are. It would be true even if you were British, for instance, but since you are an American, it is definitely true. But since you’re frum, the situation is further exacerbated. Being a girl helps, but only a little.
As I said, with articles being the only exception.
It would be rude if I were serious. But then, if I were serious, you would not be talking to me.
'because I am not a native English speaker, I am on a much better footing than you are. '
on the contrary.
Maybe. Or maybe I'm self distructive.
whats the conclusion?
The same. You’ve just proven the truth of my words in an attempt to deny them. Unless it was some sort of ironic comment.
no. i still think i am better at english than you are. if you are really foreign as you claim to be.
Well, I don’t usually make six mistakes in three sentences.
where did i make mistakes?
In the comment made at 8:10 pm.
Crawling Axe said...
That was my point: because I am not a native English speaker, I am on a much better footing than you are. It would be true even if you were British, for instance, but since you are an American, it is definitely true. But since you’re frum, the situation is further exacerbated. Being a girl helps, but only a little.
As I said, with articles being the only exception.
It would be rude if I were serious. But then, if I were serious, you would not be talking to me.
August 19, 2009 8:08 PM
i was quoting you.
'because I am not a native English speaker, I am on a much better footing than you are. '
on the contrary.
Maybe. Or maybe I'm self distructive.
1. Using single-quotes for a quotation of the first order.
2. Using foot signs for quotation marks.
3. Starting a sentence from the lower-case letter (twice). Even though you were quoting me in the first case (should have started with a capital letter or used ellipsis).
4. Inserting a space between the end of a quote and the quotation mark.
5. Using a foot sign for postrophe.
6. Writing “self-destructive” without a hyphen.
7. Misspelling “destructive”.
Did I say “six”?
apostrophe*
omg i was quoting YOU for g-d's sake! give me a break!
I would hate you as an english teacher.
I know you were quoting me. So what?
It’s a good thing I don’t teach English then. Although I am considering getting into proof-reading business.
(I stared with TRS’s essay.)
I was quoting you. So all your little numbers are for naught. I don't need to be proper when I am quoting you.
Proof-reading. Editing. As a non-native English speaker? That's like a slap in the face.
Which essay? He writes so many.
You are starting to annoy me.
Why not? Does your brain stop working when you quote people? Is that a disability?
One would think that if you need help (from anyone) in proof-reading a text written in your native language, you’re beyond getting a slap in the face. You’re somewhere between drooling in your sleep and drooling while riding a bus.
Unless you come from background which undervalues secular education.
You are starting to annoy me.
Thanks for the progress report. As I said, free of charge.
I'm sure you get great enjoyment out of it.
No actually, I don't. My parents value a secular education, as they themselves are baal teshuva, and brought us up with those same values.
Unfortunatly, the system messed me up along the way.
And what is your native toungue, may I ask?
All jokes aside now, I think it is a problem (not with you, bichlal). Also, I don’t know anything about your parents, and if I did I would not presume to have an opinion about their education of you, but in my very humble opinion, if they valued secular (or any other) education, they would not trust “the system”.
Russian.
(I want to add that I did not say that in any attempt to be offensive — either jokingly or seriously. And it was not personal — ditto.)
You are right, but the problem of most baal teshuvas is to want for their kids what they didn't have for themselves, i.e. a fully jewish chabad education. What can you do.
None taken.
I figured Russian. Till very recently, I didn't like the Russians as a people. I don't like the French either. But my opinion is slowly changing. Of Russians at least. And no, not from you.
I'm thinking of college. It is hard to break out of the mold once you are in it. But possible.
And no, my brain does not stop working. It is the informal attitude of bloggers and blog forums that cause people to throw proper language use out the window. I'm sure you suffer from it occassionally.
I want to give my kids the best Lubavitch education I can. At the same time giving the best secular education I want appropriate. But in either I am not playing to rely on any system — i.e., send my kids to a particular school and think that I’ve done my part. If one wants one’s kids to have certain values, education, etc., one must apply an active effort.
At least in my opinion (but not just mine... my stalker agrees, I think).
deem appropriate*
I hate Russians. Can’t stand them.
(90% serious, 10% joking.)
I do consider Russian culture (both Russian Jewish and Russian goyish) to be superior to American one. I don’t think the same about French culture.
I hate the French. Can't stand them.
Very good. I like your view on chil education.
And there you go bringing your stalker into this. If she has an opinion she can voice it here ________________________________.
You are right about culture. America doesn't have culture. We just sort of appeared here.
So are you a baal teshuva?
Also, in my opinion (as someone who took classes in two Universities and taught in one), you should go to college if you have a specific reason to do it (i.e., for a specific profession that you already know you’d like to pursue).
Thats funny, because what I've seen, many public school and secular kids go to college because that's whats expected of them, and yet they have no idea what they are going for.
Yes, I want to go into psychology. And possibly English as well.
She doesn’t need to do anything. :)
America has a culture. Just not a very solid or pnimiyusdik one. Americans who “just appeared here” also had a culture — British, Dutch, German, etc.
Not yet. In process...
Of course she doesn't. But it seems that you like to be her voice.
You sound like a frum guy. At least on TRS's blog. Be careful.
And really, I don't see much culture here.
I just know what her opinions are on certain issues.
I would consider myself frum. Just not ba’al teshuva.
There is a certain culture. “Culture” does not mean “high culture”. McDonalds, air conditioned boats, Britney Spears — that’s culture.
Ew, if you consider Britney Spears as 'culture' than I would question your sanity.
Frum but not baal teshuva? You lost me.
I don’t consider herself to be good culture, but she is representative of what a certain group of people like, what their values, habits and leisure methods are — therefore, she is representative of their culture.
Frum = moving steadily towards a certain point.
Baal teshuva = being at that point.
Sadly, that might be true. Very very sad.
ok got it.
Re: Baal teshuva. It is not a place, you must be constantly moving. In that we are all baal teshuvas.
Post a Comment